I know it’s accepted by now that the MSM group will label any conservative group, “conservative,” any libertarian group, “conservative,” and any liberal group, “left-leaning” or “centrist,” when they bother to label them at all.  But when a new one comes along, it’s good to put both that group’s leanings, and the MSM’s failure to note them, on the record.

The Denver Post recently ran a story about small business’s internal divide over health care “reform.”  In it, this:

Despite those fears, a study from the nonprofit Small Business Majority found health reform, even with a mandate, would save small business more than $500 billion over the next decade.

“Should everybody be in?” asked Elisabeth Arenales, an analyst with the Colorado Center on Law and Policy. “What’s the contribution of the business sector? Businesses stand to gain a lot from health-insurance reform.”

The CCLP may be talking about small business, but that doesn’t mean it’s speaking for small business.  Far from it.

As for the Small Business Majority, it’s definitely a “left-leaning” advocacy group, with a pretty typical pedigree for such recent endeavors.  Founded by a liberal Silicon Valley dot-com boomer, (he’s given exclusively to Democrats and Democrat causes), the group boasts that it, “works with the White House to organize policy discussions that focus on small business issues.”  It’s an advocate of greater government involvement in health care, and appears to have been founded specifically in order to promote that goal.  It examines reform proposals, but only those that increase government involvement.

There’s nothing necessarily the matter with this.  Most groups claim to be “unbiased.”  But only a biased paper would accept such claims at face value.

Now that Elden has finally finished a room – my office – things should start to move faster. Certainly my Internet connection will move faster.

Fast enough to catch this item from the Washington Post, marveling how the birth rates in Europe seem to be on the rebound. The researchers used the relationship between something called HDI, or Human Development Index, and the Total Fertility Rate (TFR). Keep an eye on that latter measure, because it’s going to become very important.

According to the researchers, once a society reaches a certain HDI, its fertility increases. Not only is this true statically – countries past the magic 0.86 mark in 2005 show higher birth rates – but it’s true dynamically. Countries which moved past the 0.86 score almost all increase their fertility compared to 1975.

So Mark Steyn is wrong, right? Europe’s declining fertility has been reversed through the magic of the progressive welfare state, and perhaps this will give them the leeway to commandeer ever-larger portions of future generations’ wealth! The only mystery is why this miracle is occurring, which of course provides the paper’s obligatory plea for more funds for further research.

The flaw in the analysis is the sort that could only be made by researchers trained to ignore the most obvious reasons. Remember that “T” and that stands for “Total?” Right. The study makes absolutely no effort to determine who is having all these kids. I know this because I actually went to the library and read both the paper and the accompanying “Demography” note by Stanford researcher Shripad Tuljapurkar.  Because it insists on treating all residents of a country the same, it flails about, looking for the magical mystery pill that’s causing some countries but not others to abide by the trend.  They finally settle on some vague sense that maybe it has to do with how easy it is for women to earn a living and re-enter the workforce.  The problem, as the Tuljapurkar admits, is that HDI doesn’t make any distinctions between the sexes:

…in some countries, including Japan, South Korea, and Canada, the TFR continued to decline…These puzzling findings may instead due to the use of the HDI, which does not directly tell us which aspects of human development affect women rather than men.

The authors themselves list a litany of statistical relationships they’d like to examine for correlations:

labour-market flexibility, social security and individual welfare, gender and economic inequality, human capital and social/family policies…

Hmmm, what’s missing here?

Basically, the authors just pull this idea out of thin air, with nothing in their research pointing to it.  They do so because they don’t admit – can’t admit – that it’s the immigrants who are having the kids.  Everyone knows this, apparently, except the three authors of this paper, because they didn’t bother to look.  Fertility didn’t increase in Japan and South Korea because they have virtually no immigrant population to speak of.  The reversal in Israel began in 1992 because that’s when the walls came down and Jews were finally free to get the hell out of the formerly Communist country.  Even if I grant that you can call a reversal year of 1976 on a data set that begins in 1975, fertility increases level off in the USA, even as HDI marches on.  Hispanic women have, according to the Census Bureau, the distinction of being the only ethnic group reproducing above replacement rate.

In fact, this paper tells us nothing new. It actually reconfirms the societal trends that are killing the liberal West. And it reconfirms the evergreen that social science researchers find what they were looking for in the first place.

You know, twine.  Heavier than string, lighter than rope.  Twine.  No fewer than three different workers at the Oceanside Walgreen’s had no idea what twine was.  Maybe they thought I was doing my Eliza Doolittle impersonation, and knew that they didn’t carry Tom Sawyer or Huck Finn.

I hate to say this, but flying United last time reminded me of what a class experience Jet Blue is.  Last night, though, the TV stations worked fine, but the music stations had no sound, which is a problem for radio.  What I wanted to do was go to sleep for a few hours.  What I did was work on the new County Party website.  So I arrived in NY in the midst of my own personal, if significantly more low-key and low-stakes, version of 24.

Do you know long it takes to pack a 26-foot truck?  I mean, pack it so that ants couldn’t find space in there?  About 7 hours, is how long.   Which means that the beagle is 7 hours closer to a nervous breakdown, and I was yet another 7 hours further away from sleep.  I wish I could report that a truck packed the gills dampened the reverb from the beautifully maintained Pennsylvania Interstate system, but there’s absolutely nothing about that statement that’s correct.

Now the last time I did the first portion of this trip, I-80 through Pennslvania and New Jersey, and I-95 from Jersey through the gloriously-named Throgs Neck Bridge, it was in the reverse direction, at about midnight, and I had no idea where I was, or really where I was headed, only that I really didn’t have any good options for changing routes.  This time, I got to see what I missed.  If I ever saw the view of  Manhattan from the GW Bridge, I had certainly forgotten it.  And the sheer complexity of the New York highway system is awe-inspiring, although even that’s not quite enough to let you forgive Robert Moses for what he did to the place with his roads.

What’s interesting is how even the Interstates need to bow to the dictates of geology.  Pennsylvania has these great folds of mountains that cut from southwest to northeast, and the only roads that try to cross against them are the Turnpike, and to a lesser extent, US-322 to State College.  Even I-80 skirts the top of them without really challenging, and US-30, the old Lincoln Highway, mostly follows them until they curve south near Pittsburgh.

Tomorrow, I’m hoping to try US-11 and US-322.  Until then, that’s all from Hazleton, PA.

I’ll see your Sarah Palin resignation speech, and raise you a Joe Biden commencement address:

I believe so strongly, as you may recall when I was here in October, not in you particularly but your generation…

…you’re about to graduate into a point in history where everything is going to change no matter what you do, but you can affect the change.

You’re going to walk across this stage without knowing for certain what’s on the other side.

…there’s not a single solitary decision confronting your generation now that doesn’t yield a change from non-action as well as action.

Non-action is action, unlike most generations.

There’s not a single issue on this President’s plate that will not yield a change — just merely by ignoring it, it will change.

They voted for change, not certain what it would mean, but convicted in the assumption that we cannot sustain the path we’re on.  (“convicted in the assumption?”)

And our own interpretive muse:

Joe Biden Take 2
By Tarzana Joe

Read the rest of this entry »

Podcast: Play in new window | Download

Just a couple of quick shots from last evening’s rally and counter-rally at the state capitol on health care.  (Sandoval has the pix on the lunch-time AFP rally.)  First, the rally.  It was organized by the Obama after-campaign and the SEIU, and it showed.  There were three signs in abundance: a purple SEIU-inspired sign, sheets that read, “Single Payer,” and those blue leftovers from last year’s campaign:

And the counter-rally, held down on Lincoln to frequent horn-honks:

For all that time, union muscle, and organization, the socialists managed about 200.  The counter, consisting mostly of different people from the afternoon AFP event, with only a few hours to publicize, got 100 people.  (Don’t try counting the people in this photo.  I shot a panoramic series and counted them individually at home, since I’m pretty lousy at estimating crowd sizes.)

The Channel 7 report, naturally, all but ignored the large AFP rally, showing only footage from this evening’s Obamafest.  Although they were eager to find someone from the “other side,” they probably could have found someone better.   Here’s the video report.

Podcast: Play in new window | Download

So the layout isn’t done yet, but I’m back from hack-ware purgatory. I’ll be working on the design over time, and it’ll be a little different from before.

All told, from the initial baked-on-clay-tablets, to the blogspot, to the various incarnations of MT, and now to WP, this will be the fourth version of the site.

The archives are still available, starting here, but obviously the search won’t work, since MT needed to be taken out and burnt, with all of its clothes, “bring out your dead”-style, in order to get the malware police to believe the site was safe.

The email updates apparently require a plugin, so I’ll have to get that, and acquaint myself with the whole new world of WP plugins, as opposed to the Old World of MT plugins. And for the moment, I’ll keep comments and trackbacks off, since I think that may have been the back door for the first invasion.

In the meantime, welcome back to the View.