Archive for category PPC

Monday Morning Spy

It’s looking more and more as though the Obama Administration didn’t have a post-war plan in Libya.  Radical Islamists will indeed be a part of the government.  And tribalism (to put the most polite possible face on it) is rearing its ugly head.

For Labor Day:  The bad of unions, and the good.  The Americans always saw ourselves as potential winners rather than losers, settling for what came along, explains why unions never really achieved the sort of radical political power they did in Europe.

View has long been a booster of ties to India.  So, a little news from that part of the world.  At least one Japanese economist sees India as overtaking China in Foreign Direct Investment over the next decade.  Perhaps, as long as the Reserve Bank of India doesn’t try to dictate its terms.   It’s only recently that currency controls have been loosened in India, so the bureaucrat-think is still strong there.  Even the paperless office doesn’t seem to be a goal, much less on the horizon.  Hey, I appreciate a good Selectric as much as the next guy – they’re smooth machines – but I don’t think View would have much readership without the Net.

The business establishment sees opportunity with China, rather than rivalry.  I’m not sure the Chinese see it the same way, and I think the world outlooks are sufficiently different that they’ll come into conflict eventually.

In the meantime, cultural schackles can be hard to shake off, even for immigrants.  I wonder if Indian immigrants to America see things the same way.  It’s possible, but my first guess would be that they don’t.

In the meantime, over in Europe, Merkel, in order to form a more fiscal union, may propose an end run around Lisbon, which was itself, an end run around the people of Europe.  I don’t see how a two-speed Europe is any more sustainable than the current model, but maybe there’s a plan in mind.

And in other European Trends We Don’t Want To Follow, in our zeal to record and hold the police accountable, we can’t destroy respect for them.  That way lies London.

Crumbling infrastructure?  We’re actually spending more. The two statements aren’t in opposition, of course.  If you go on a building spree, a lot of those projects will fall apart at the same time, and government’s never been very good at setting aside sinking funds for future expenses.  Our problem is that we’re spending the money in the wrong places.

Yes, Social Security IS a Pyramid scheme.

There are Icons, and then there are icons.

In a wide-ranging study (L’image interdite, 1994) the French philosopher Alain Besançon has argued that the fear and suspicion of images has influenced the development of religion and philosophy throughout recorded history, and has not disappeared merely because we are now surrounded and distracted by images on every side and at every moment of the day. Indeed, much of what disturbs people in our image-saturated culture is what disturbed the theologians of Islam (and Judaism – ed): namely, that the “graven image,” which begins as a representation, soon becomes a substitute. And substitutes corrupt the feelings that they invite, in the way that idols corrupt worship, and pornography corrupts desire. For substitutes invite easy and mechanical responses. They short-circuit the costly process whereby we form real relationships, and put mechanical and addictive reflexes in their place. The idol does not represent God: it defaces Him, in something like the way pornography defaces love.

Can batteries boost solar power? The author is clearly a booster himself, and I think he wishes away a lot of the economic, technical, and agricultural issues.  But it’s always worth know the latest.

No Comments

Sunday Spy

Having missed Friday, and of course, taken Saturday off, the Spy has a little catching up to do.

Irwin Stelzer at The Weekly Standard explains why American hasn’t lost its fundamental advantages:   “Translation: if we get our policies right, there is no reason America can’t recapture the optimism and energy that we once called “the American dream.”

As for getting the policies right, we could start here.

Now playing on TVs all across New York City.  Whoever the Republican nominee is, he’ll have a hard time carrying New York, so this is really a reminder to some of Obama’s biggest fundraisers

Remember the Water Cycle?  Rain to streams, to evaporation to clouds to rain?  That’s pretty much the Dems’ game: tax money, to failing businesses and unions, to political contributions.  Except the Water Cycle didn’t leak water the way this system leaks money.

What’s the matter with saying that, if this $1,000,000,000 is critical, it’s more important than some other $1,000,000,000 that the government is spending somewhere else?

The warmists’ war on science continues.

Just when you thought Moore’s Law was in serious danger, ever smaller flash memory is on the horizon.

Verlander is the MVP.  So what if he’s a pitcher?  I’m hoping that the Tigers will give him one last tune-up on the 20th or 21st down in KC, so I can drive down to see him.

Why the mortgage lawsuit against the banks is going to be a tough sell.  “Many of these same banks got themselves in serious financial trouble by gorging on their own toxic mortgage securities, which dims the fraud angle.  Unfortunately, being arrogant idiots with the risk appetite of a coked-up skydiver is not a crime.”

All that talk about the debt ceiling debate changing the discussion, maybe it wasn’t just talk.

“If you’re wondering exactly who has been the first to lose confidence in the European banking system, look no further. It seems that at the forefront is the European banking system itself.”

Apparently, Obama’s new economic advisor believes that increasing wages causes an increase the demand for labor.  There are some boutique situations where higher prices help define a brand.  Entry-level labor isn’t one of them.

A California ballot initiative would shift virtually all mortgage risk onto the lender.  You can see the ads now: “Welcome to California.  Cash Only.”  It’s as though someone was reading Atlas Shrugged, saw some of the legislative proposals there, and drew all the wrong lessons.

And lest we risk becoming too earnest, some corporations know how to communicate with shareholders.

No Comments

Thursday Morning Spy

We begin overseas this morning.

China offers the defense of the guilty (a paraphrase of “contains significant errors and inaccuracies”) in response to a Pentagon report claiming that it’s pointing nukes at India.  Between that and a developing blue-water navy, China’s neighbors will either band together or cut a deal.

What’s that?  Did someone mention China’s navy?

One of the Mitt Romney’s weaknesses is his thin foreign and defense file.  But power abhors a vacuum, and right now, we’re sucking the life out of our own navy.  Good for him for calling attention to this.

And one last Asia post, noting again, for the benefit of friends of ethanol, non-friends of math, that when you reduce supply, prices rise.

The former European editor of The Guardian argues that, suddenly, the European people (as though they mattered) are in favor of more central power for Brussels.  Or at least they will be, once their betters tell them to be.

So the EU is being a thought-follower and banning 60-watt light bulbs.  Which leads the fluorescent bulb-makers to raise their prices by 25%.  The bulb-makers are just taking advantage of a rent-seeking opportunity, of course, but does anyone over there (or over here) understand that this is just sand in the already-lurching gears of world manufacturing?

James Lileks, call your office.  Tell them you’ll be going out for lunch.

The good news: Fannie and Freddie say the delinquencies have stabilized.  The bad news: that’s like hearing from your doctor that you’re in stable but critical condition.

DOJ on T-Mobile/AT&T: hey, if we won’t let them create jobs the old-fashioned way, can we at least skim a little off the top for the attorneys?

Megan McArdle on media bias: it’s not the answers, it’s the questions.  It’s Asymmetrical Information!

We’ve seen a lot of unconstitutional stupidity.  Here’s a case of constitutional stupidity.  What, aside from their own paychecks, are these regulators protecting?

Suitcase nukes.  Not what you think.  Because wind’s not an option there, either.

Today’s infographic: what do you call that body of flowing water nearby?

Privacy protection with Flickr, featuring an intuitive interface.  Adam Savage, paging Adam Savage.

And to close up for this morning, some thoughts on your next vacation.  “Hey Rocky, why don’t we jump off a cliff?”

No Comments

Monty Python and the Jobs Speech

This from the guy who claimed that he was a better political director than his political director.

For those of you who have better things to do than watch the national media try to keep their presidential Google Calendars updated, the President of the United States just suffered the worst stuffing since Joe Theismann threw Rocket Screen into the hands of Jack Squirek.

Trying to bigfoot upstage the Republican presidential debate scheduled for next Wednesday at 8:00 Eastern Political War Time, Obama tried to schedule what he’s billing as a major policy address on jobs to a joint session of Congress.  Only someone apparently declined to remind him of local protocol.  The President doesn’t get to summon Congress to hear him address them from on high.  He asks permission to speak, and has to be formally invited.  He may have tried to forget the results of the 2010 elections, but Speaker John Boehner hasn’t and the Speaker declined to sign off on the deal.

The President had a couple of options.  He could request a time before the debate, and let the Republican candidates jointly deliver the rebuttal.  Or he could pick a time after the debate, and risk having the TV cameras catch Dingell, or Conyers, or Akaka, or Inouye, or Lautenberg get an early start on their beauty sleep.

But the Speaker – and the networks covering the debate – wouldn’t budge.  Instead, he chose to accept the Speaker’s invitation for Thursday night.

Opposite the season opener of the NFL.

Telestrator vs. Teleprompter in a battle for the hearts, minds, and remote controls of America.  Good luck with that, Mr. President.

The game is New Orleans vs. Green Bay.  How appropriate that the man with the permanently sub-zero approval index will be going up against the Frozen Tundra.  Seriously, doesn’t he ever get tired of losing to Wisconsin?

It’s like the bridge scene in Monty Python and the Holy Grail:

“What is your name?”
“Barack Obama.”
“What is your quest?”
“To get re-elected.”
“What is the date of your speech?”
“September seve – no!  Eighth!  Ahhhhhhhhhhhhh!”

We’ve all been having a good time placing bets on when Obama will be attacked by some small, usually harmless water mammal, but this really is the sort of thing you could imagine coming out of the Carter White House.  And it’s completely self-inflicted.  If he gets the reservation for the 7th, he reminds everyone of the petty, thin-skinned, machine politician whose tactics don’t work so well at the national level.  If he changes the date, he either looks weak or uninformed, and unlike blowing right through “God Save the Queen,” there’s no State Department protocol office to blame for this one.

Boehner could have been gracious, but why?  Obama hasn’t exactly done anything to earn it.  He invited the Republicans to a Health Care Summit, and then shot lasers out of his eyes when Paul Ryan had the temerity to question his arithmetic, which was worse than Standard & Poors’s.  He used the State of the Union address to demagogue the Supreme Court, with the result that a number of justices have just stopped coming to that annual ritual.  He invited the aforementioned Paul Ryan to a budget policy address, only to publicly embarrass him and propose nothing of his own.  And then, after Cantor and Biden, and then Boehner and Reid thought they had debt ceiling agreements, he submarined each of them, leaving them to wonder why he was wasting their time.

A small man occupying a large office runs the risk of having it shrink wrap him at his desk, and that’s pretty much what’s happening to Obama.

You get the feeling that this is a president who wants to be Lyndon Johnson, but ends up looking like James Buchanan.  He’s politicized virtually every aspect of governance, and sicced the NLRB, the Justice Department, and the EPA on his political enemies.  But at the same time as he completely gets the vast administrative power of the Presidency, he equally completely doesn’t get its symbolic power.   Which is why since John Boehner took the gavel back from the hands of America’s children, he’s gotten the better of Obama at every turn.

Odds are the speech itself – if anyone’s listening – will just confirm it.  He’ll have nothing new to offer but more of your – or rather your grandchildren’s – money, and he almost certainly will allude to his preferred speaking slot.  He’ll leave a couple of blank spaces until Wednesday night for the speechwriters to throw in some lines challenging the Republican themes of the night before, and the press will praise his courage.   Even if he does claim to drop a couple of substantial regulations, the departments won’t actually change policy (see offshore drilling), or the regulations will show up in some other context.

So the President, with Democrats having loudly proclaimed that this was the summer to prepare the battlefield for next year’s election, finds himself out of ideas,  at the mercy of events, with people having tuned him out, ready to fire him, focused on interviewing his replacement.

Are you ready for some football?

No Comments

Wednesday Morning Spy

Iran sees some strategic value in helping the Libyan rebels.  Well, since we were mostly just interested in preventing a refugee flood into Europe, they probably have more staying power, too.

State pensions.  You thought it was bad?  It’s worse.

Maybe we could just cherry-pick BC, Alberta, and the plains provinces.

Sorry, Airports Council.  Airport slots are a commodity.  These were the same guys who were arguing for more freedom to raise passenger charges to secure revenue bonds.  But the airports involved are almost all government-run, so it’s more about autonomy than the market for them.

Well, that’s ok.  Soon the pilots won’t know which direction the gates are, anyway.

That’s right, from a government that can’t program its own labor rules into an iPhone app when they’re sober.  (You assume facts not in evidence, sir.)

Republicans float a proposal to actually, you know, use our leverage to force the UN to reform.  And this is just the low-hanging fruit.

Remember when we all mourned the loss of Bell Labs?  Microsoft has the room, the time, the talent, and the money to fund applied research, too.

How the EU might be able to get around its treaty limitations, and issue Eurobonds. And here’s why they might want to:

Meanwhile, in an interview with FAZ, French Foreign Minister Alain Juppé warned, “The dissolution of the eurozone is not acceptable, because it would also be the dissolution of Europe. If that happens, then everything is possible. Young people seem to believe that peace is guaranteed for all time…But if we look around in Europe there is new populism and nationalism. We cannot play with that.”

Eurobonds by Eurocrats.  Sound about right.  Maybe if the all-vanilla center-left-center-right-center parties hadn’t outlawed debate on anything substantive, they might find more support.  There’s basically no address where the average European can go to complain about things, or to effect change.

Joseph Epstein on the race-, class-, and gender-obsessed gated communities that English departments have become:

Yet, through the magic of dull and faulty prose, the contributors to “The Cambridge History of the American Novel” have been able to make these presumably worldly subjects seem parochial in the extreme—of concern only to one another, which is certainly one derogatory definition of the academic. These scholars may teach English, but they do not always write it, at least not quite.

One-third of the US corn crop could be vulnerable to bugs that have adapted around Monsanto’s GM line.  Well, with any luck, it’ll be the third we were sending to ethanol.

States ask for Medicaid relief.  They should know.  They can’t even estimate the costs of their own policy changes.

Better plans for better boarding time, through math.

No Comments

Incuriousness From The Washington Post

In a generally upbeat assessment of how Muslims feel about America, and about their place in it, the Washington Post drops this bit about how American Muslims feel about the job their own clergy is doing in fighting radicalism:

The Pew study found that six in 10 U.S.-born Muslims faulted Islamic leaders for not speaking out against extremism, as did 43 percent of Muslim immigrants.

Officials with Muslim advocacy groups say that they have spoken out repeatedly against extremists but that the American public, including Muslims, often doesn’t hear about it.

“Our reach in terms of community awareness of our programs promoting moderation is not where we’d like it to be,” said Safaa Zarzour, secretary general of the Islamic Society of North America, the nation’s largest Muslim group.

I do think it’s heartening that the American-born Muslims are more likely to expect more out of their leaders in this regard.  (It’s hard to know what goes on in any individual mosque, and it’s unclear what leaders the survey is referring to, so I can’t really comment on the absolute numbers.)  And we’re not just talking about public statements.  Muslims leaders should also be in a position to do due diligence on overseas charities and their representatives that go on fundraising swings here in the States.

But that line about the ISNA is rich in irony.  The Islamic Society of North America – it goes unmentioned by the Post remains an unindicted co-conspirator in the Holy Land case, which involved coordination among a number of high-profile American Muslim organization to funnel money to Hamas, in violation of American law and fundamental civilizational principles.  That coordination was organized and facilitated by the Muslim Brotherhood, that well-known, largely secular group.

So the ISNA, which aided and abetted the murder of Jews overseas, just can’t understand why people don’t think they’re moderate enough

No Comments

Tuesday Morning Spy

It’s not just the Denver Post who’s incurious.

It’s not just guitar-makers who are getting sandbagged.

And it’s not just Wisconsin who’s letting local governments cut down on fringe benefits.

Why the address for protesting Gilad Shalit’s captivity is Gaza, not Jerusalem.  The left sees this as a way to bludgeon Netanyahu, but any honest moral reading should blame Hamas.

What adults expect from a liberal arts education.  We know, because they’ll pay good money for it.  Maybe we should expect the same thing for people who are going into lifelong debt for it?

CalPERS admits that more conservative pension debt valuations make sense.  PERA, are you listening?

Once you get past the academic-speak, LIT., a Core77 design winner, is a very cool interface.

 

No Comments

Lies, Damn Lies, and Infographics

This is what happens when people get outside their area of competence.  FastCoDesign.com has its Infographic of the Day, and it can be a delight to behold.

But sometimes, like people who fell in love with the Obama “O,” they end up missing the flaws because they’ve fallen in love with the graphic design.  The infographic on “Do Green Jobs Really Exist?” is a case in point, as the comments make clear.  Here’s the graphic they like:

To his own surprise, Mr. Kuang concludes that Green Jobs not only exist, they’re pretty good jobs for middle-class workers, who don’t necessarily need advanced degrees.

But that was never in question.  Of course, green jobs exist.  But what the graphic doesn’t show is that while they’re well-paying, they’re also incredibly expensive and heavily subsidized, much moreso than oil and gas are, for instance.  On a per-unit-of-energy produced basis, they’re even more expensive, which means they’re a massive misdirection of resources, sapping the vitality of other industries which could employ far more people for the same price.

What’s a little disturbing is that Kuang thought that the argument was about the existence of the jobs, rather than their price-to-value ratio.  Admittedly, one data point is a thin reed on which to base a concern.  But it does suggest that we need to do a better job articulating the Bastiat-Hazlitt concerns about subsidies if we’re going to win this argument.

No Comments

Monday Morning Spy

Hey, Tom Friedman, call your office.  Those environmentally- and safety-conscious Chinese have done it again, as their major oil refinery catches on fire for the 2nd time in the last few months.

Europe, call a cab.  It looks as though Germany is throwing you out of its basement.

Or, you could call for a bus.  More on why inter-city bus travel is better than trains.

Paul Krugman, call it quits.  Just because Republicans don’t like your version of the dismal science doesn’t mean they don’t like science at all.

Maybe next time you use GPS while driving, you won’t need to call a wrecker.  Using the Android phones’ camera to keep your eyes on the road, even when they’re not.

If Iowa’s a single-issue ethanol state, then Rick Perry will need to call for backup.  I get the feeling, though, that he’s researched this question a little more than we think.

No Comments

Jobs and the Pantheon

Where does he belong?

America still has rock star CEOs: Bill Gates, Warren Buffet, Jack Welch, Michael Eisner, and the subject of today’s discussion, Steve Jobs.  Only Gates and Jobs were personally innovative, though, and between the two, only Jobs created products that people want to need, as opposed to ones they feel they’re stuck needing.

Although many articles have already recited the litany of life-changing inventions Jobs was responsible for, it’s worth running through them again, if only to have as a handy reference. The was: the Apple II (we had the II+, and Dad splurged for 48K of memory), the Mac, Pixar, the iMac, the iPod, iTunes, the iPhone, and the iPad.

But just as sex didn’t start in the 1960s, great companies didn’t start in the 80s.  Before Jobs, in some sense, at the beginning, there was Edison and Ford.  If you’re looking for comparable versatility and influence on the consumer market, directly on the lives of millions, or billions of people, those two are the gold standard.

With the distance of time, and the ravages of curricular political correctness, we forget exactly how revolutionary Edison was.  The soon-to-be-contraband light bulb, of course.  But also the electrical distribution system to run it (and the dynamo, conductive system, and on-off outlets that were required to run it).  The phonograph.  Movies.  There were about 1100 others, but those are the biggies.  And of course, Edison had to create and run the company that wired New York.

Ford, of course, developed the assembly line for automobiles.  But his genius was his insistence on creating an affordable car for the up-and-coming middle class.  Without that, the car remains a toy for the rich, and eventually industrial uses.  It was a conscious decision by Ford to make a car that the average employee could afford.  That it would be 10 years before inter-city auto travel became the norm, and 30 years before the thing would start reliably, is beside the point.  The car, as Wendell Cox has pointed out, meant that for the first time in history, the mass of people could travel distant from where they were born, and come back.

So where does Jobs stack up against these two?  I think he combines elements of both, and just as we have to adjust for the era in which baseball players played, we also have to adjust for the era in which Jobs CEOed.

The Apple II and the Mac, I think, are most like Ford’s Models A and T.  It was Jobs’s insight that the average guy not only could have a computer, but that he’d figure out what to do with it.  He and the other Steve, Wozniak, worked to make their computer affordable.  And later, Jobs insisted that the Mac be small enough to be  accessible.  (Also like Ford, he left his company, saw it passed by its main competitor, and returned to revive it, but that’s really taking the analogy too far.)

But if Jobs was more than Ford, he was, perhaps more like Edison.  The iPod is our phonograph.  Edison didn’t invent music, he just made it more available.  Jobs didn’t invent portable music, he just made it more available, in spectacular fashion.  The iPhone and the Mac perhaps add up to the light bulb.   If Edison could – in the hands of Hollywood – give an impassioned speech about people ruining their eyes trying to read by expensive candles, Jobs could made similar claims about computerizing our small-to-mid-size company finances, and putting the Internet in the palm of our hands, with similar productivity gains.  I can’t begin to tell you the number of times I’ve been saved by having Google Maps in the car, or being able to call ahead to say I’ll be late, without having to pull off the highway, find a – working – pay phone, and a phone book, and then find my way back to the highway.  And that’s, like, 1% of what the smartphone does.

Of course, Pixar was a marriage of computing technology and the movies that Edison made.  There, perhaps, Jobs is Walt Disney, even as Pixar made him Disney’s biggest shareholder.

Like Edison, Jobs has a huge back catalog of patents that either haven’t made it to market, or won’t.  Unlike Edison, Jobs appears to have left behind an culture of innovation that, properly husbanded, can continue to churn out marvelous toys for at least another decade.

But what sets Edison apart is the electrical distribution system, which made all that followed possible.  Jobs really has nothing like it to his credit.  But then, nobody does.  The closest analogy in our day would be, I think the Internet, in all its incarnations, and both the landline and wifi internets have been the result of corporate, rather than individual effort, although there have been some brilliant individual innovators along the way (Tim Berners-Lee and Marc Andreessen, call your offices.)

So Jobs isn’t Edison, or Ford, or Disney.  He’s Steve Jobs.  And that’s plenty enough to put him in the first rank of American inventor-innovator-businessmen.

No Comments