Probably. It appears that students do study certain landmark cases in their specialized classes. And yet, there's little if any sense of the overall development of American law. With over half the curriculum given over to electives, there's plenty of room to add in a few more required courses. She mentioned that while DU does have an elective legal history course, it was taught at the undergraduate level, with little if any legal analysis required.
I was talking with a law-student friend of mine yesterday, not particularly conservative, and she remarked that after having actually read Roe, she was surprised to find just what a lousy opinion it was, especially compared to earlier opinions, and that she'd be perfectly happy overturning it and starting from scratch.
Imagine the effect of such a course on the bulk of law students, and then ask why such a course isn't required.