After the election, Dick Wadhams sent out an email discussing the role of the party in vetting candidates for office.\u00a0 Dick was roundly criticized for the mess that the Republican side of the governor’s race became, largely for his failure to properly “vet” candidates for that office.\u00a0 He makes the point – rightly – that the people who are criticizing him for not vetting the candidates are the same ones who saw him as Bismarck in the last cycle, maneuvering everywhere, with any lack of maneuvering all the more evidence for his Machiavellian schemes.<\/p>\n

The Party is not Dick Wadhams.\u00a0 The party is everyone who shows up at caucus, assembly, convention, or primary.\u00a0 The reason we have a caucus and a primary is exactly to vet the candidates, to see their strengths and weaknesses, to ask hard questions, to see how they’ll react to a long campaign, and to learn more about them.\u00a0 The party chairman should tell a candidate for statewide office that a bankruptcy can’t be hidden and will be terminal.\u00a0 Most would also look unkindly at a chairman substituting his judgment for that of the candidate or the party.<\/p>\n

Neither should the party elders substitute their judgment for that of the party.\u00a0 I largely blame them for the mess of a nomination process.\u00a0 No amount of vetting could have uncovered the “plagiarism” by Scott McInnis.\u00a0 That was deliberately leaked, for personal reasons by people inside the party, at a time when it could do the most damage.\u00a0 And McInnis’s ham-handed handling of the charge kept him from recovering from it.<\/p>\n

Had Josh Penry still been in the race, even for a few months, even with all his flaws, had the party elders simply sat back and waited to see how things played out, rather than trying to pick the nominee before the caucuses, it might have been a different story.\u00a0 Because ultimately, the embarrassment didn’t come from McInnis not being vetted, but from Maes not being vetted.\u00a0 Few who used him as a protest vote wanted him to win the nomination.\u00a0 McInnis never felt threatened enough to do any digging.\u00a0 But in a race between McInnis and Penry, each would have needed some of Maes’s votes, and at least one would have made sure that the party knew who this guy was.<\/p>\n

A couple of months ago, in the wake of the election, I heard a senior party member, a former officeholder, tell a group of activists that he hoped that the presidential nomination would be settled by the South Carolina primary.\u00a0 Coloradoans would have little say in the process aside from what checks they could write before, say, November of this year.\u00a0 Having learned nothing from the governor’s race, this fellow was prepared to repeat his errors nationally.<\/p>\n

In retrospect, it’s clear that the party’s nomination process for governor was broken, and that it had considerable outside help in getting that way.\u00a0 Whether that was Dick’s fault or not depends on what you consider to be the proper role of the party chairman.\u00a0 Dick reads his job description largely as that of a mechanic; largely non-ideological, although you want him to be on your side.<\/p>\n

The party chairman is no longer the guy with the biggest cigar in the smoke-filled room.\u00a0 Changes in campaign finance laws mean that the party machine plays little if any role in branding the party.\u00a0 That comes from the candidates.\u00a0 And the candidates meet directly with the party bosses, the ones who’ll fund their campaigns, rather than going through the party hierarchy to get there.<\/p>\n

The genius of The Blueprint isn’t just that they throw a lot of money at key races.\u00a0 It’s that they coordinate their limited resources as a team, so they are, by and large, not working at cross-purposes, spending money to defeat each other, or duplicating effort.\u00a0 The outside groups, the Tea Parties, the affiliated groups, the business lobbies, the taxpayer watchdogs, and the groups with specific policy agendas all need to be cajoled into working together to defeat Democrats.<\/p>\n

Leadership of that team needs to come from somewhere, and if the party chairman can’t do it – and Pat Waak has shown that he needn’t – then someone outside the party hierarchy needs to play that role.
\n