When the PERA Pension Obligation Bond story was in its death throes, the\u00a0Denver Post<\/em> was writing a story about the political, rather than the financial angle, of the bill and its failure in committee. \u00a0Treasurer Walker\u00a0Stapleton had testified in favor of the bill in the House Finance Committee, although most of his testimony was of a technical nature.<\/p>\n

At the time\u00a0Post<\/em> reporter John Frank called me, I had not yet heard Stapleton’s comments on the Mike Rosen Show, where he appeared to try to walk back his support for the bill. \u00a0There’s no reason to rehash the controversy here, and that’s not the point of the post.<\/p>\n

The point is this: Franks paraphrased what Stapleton had said, and asked me to comment on his\u00a0on-air statements. I asked him to quote them to me. \u00a0He quoted to me a couple of sentences, and I was brought up short. \u00a0But this was a radio talk show, and Mike Rosen is one of the best interviewers around. \u00a0The actual on-air back-and-forth was\u00a0much<\/em> longer than that.<\/p>\n

So I paused, said that, even though I had just asked him to quote Stapleton to me, I really would need to hear the whole thing before I could comment. And I went on to say something Franks probably already knew – that there were legislators without pension funding expertise who had probably been swayed by Walker’s support, and by the fact that the Republican Treasurer, Democrat Governor, and “impartial” PERA Board were all in favor of the deal.<\/p>\n

Later, after thinking about it, I came back with what I expressed as a\u00a0possible<\/em> interpretation of what Frank had quoted me, didn’t offer an opinion on it, and suggested he go back and listen to the whole interview with that idea in mind.<\/p>\n

Reporters often count on people liking to talk, and liking to talk to\u00a0reporters<\/em> specifically, because they may get to see their names in print. \u00a0But\u00a0you don’t have to answer a question if you don’t want to, and you don’t have to offer an opinion when the only information you’re getting is from the reporter.<\/p>\n

I doubt Frank was purposely trying to do a hatchet job on Walker, but there was no reason to fall into the trap of trying to offer an opinion based on an interpretation of one small piece of the story.
\n