This, from the Wall Street Journal,<\/em> describes how Virginia managed to close its budget gap<\/a>:<\/p>\n

Here’s something you don’t see often these days: a government running a budget surplus. Governor Robert McDonnell announced last week that Virginia closed fiscal 2010 some $400 million in the black. That’s a radically improved financial picture from a year ago when the state faced a $4.2 billion two-year budget hole.<\/p>\n

The usual suspects\u2014the big business lobbies, the Washington Post\u2014thought a major tax increase was needed. So did the previous Governor, Democrat Tim Kaine, who proposed a $2 billion tax hike before he left town, on top of two major Virginia tax increases in the previous eight years.<\/p>\n

Mr. McDonnell has proved otherwise. The newly elected Republican put a freeze on hiring and took the knife even to such politically sensitive programs as school aid, police and Medicaid to cut hundreds of millions of dollars. Total state spending has been reset more or less to 2007 levels. If Congress were to do that, the federal deficit could fall by more than $900 billion, or two-thirds.<\/p>\n

<\/a><\/p>\n

It’s true that Richmond used too many budget tricks to make the surplus appear larger than it really is. Sales tax payments were accelerated by one month to count in 2010 rather than 2011. Several hundred million dollars were borrowed from the public-employee pension reserve\u2014money the Governor promises to repay by 2013. Most fiscal experts think the real surplus is closer to $87 million. But given the lousy economy, Virginia’s budget achievement is laudable. <\/strong>(Emphasis added)<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Virginia does biennial budgeting, so they’ve passed their FY11 and FY12<\/a> budgets already.\u00a0 Virginia’s general fund is about $15.5 billion, and its total budget is about $38 billion, so either way, it’s about twice Colorado’s.\u00a0 Virginia was facing a $4.2 billion deficit over two years, so it was also roughly proportional to the $1 billion hole we face in FY11-12.<\/p>\n

We could begin with a meaningful hiring freeze ourselves.\u00a0 Despite the Democrats’ claim of a hiring freeze, the Bureau of Labor Statistics tells a different story:<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

It also makes the urgency of converting PERA from a defined-benefit to a defined-contribution plan even more plain.\u00a0 (For the basics on public pensions, see this primer<\/a>.)<\/p>\n

In the past, I’ve posted on the difficulty of forecasting, how despite the best intentions and best information, the folks at Legislative Council have a hard time seeing revenue crises before they hit.\u00a0 Bloomberg\u00a0 has a fine posting<\/a> on why this is so:<\/p>\n

How do economists fare when it comes to real forecasting, to predicting GDP growth and inflation one year out? About as good as a coin toss, according to Bryan\u2019s research. Less than half the economists did better than the \u201cnaive\u201d forecast, which is based on no understanding of the economy and merely assumes next year\u2019s outcome will be the same as this year\u2019s. It\u2019s what you\u2019d expect if the results were purely random….<\/p>\n

I want to hear a plausible scenario, based on what we know and what we expect, for how things are going to play out in the U.S. and on the global stage. Getting the number right is a job for an accountant. Putting that number in the context of a larger trend is a job for an economist.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

We don’t know when revenue will recover, and we don’t know when the next drop will hit.\u00a0 As a result, we need to be careful not to build in additional structural spending when times are good.<\/p>\n

Unfortunately, we’ve already used up all those gimmicks that make the Virginia surplus look larger than it is.\u00a0 For us, it’s going to be even more painful, which means it’s going to call for a seriousness that’s been lacking.\u00a0 It’s going to call for the guts to make difficult cuts, and the courage to defend them before the voters – even in odd-numbered years.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\n