<\/p>\n

In its campaign to sell its proposed reforms the PERA board has taken to emphasizing that the 30-year amortization period is written into Colorado statute.\u00a0 Per\u00a0C.R.S. 24-51-211:<\/p>\n

(1) An amortization period for each of the state division, school division, local government division, judicial division, and Denver public schools division trust funds shall be calculated separately. A maximum amortization period of thirty years shall be deemed actuarially sound.<\/strong> Upon recommendation of the board, and with the advice of the actuary, the employer or member contribution rates for the plan may be adjusted by the general assembly when indicated by actuarial experience.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Not only did they mention this at the Aurora tour stop last week, they tweeted it out last night.<\/p>\n

The less rigorous standard means they never actually have to achieve full funding. PERA’s appeal to the authority of the law in this case rings hollow.<\/p>\n

It’s the industry standard for public pensions, which is why it was written into the law in the first place.\u00a0 Presumably, if the industry standard were to change, the statute would change as well.\u00a0 Legislators aren’t experts in this material; they were clearly relying on the recommendations of the public pension stewards at the time.\u00a0 In effect, PERA is appealing to its own authority in this matter.<\/p>\n

The fact is, industry standards for public pensions haven’t saved the industry from its problems.\u00a0 Not so long ago, the industry standard was a rate of return well over 8%.\u00a0 Right after SB1 was implements, PERA’ amortization periods all dropped under 30 years.\u00a0 That lasted all of one year.<\/p>\n

The choice of a target amortization period should be based on whether or not it makes sense, not on appeals to authority that have proven less than authoritative over the years.<\/p>\n

Photo Credit: Todd Shepherd<\/em>
\n