That’s the assessment of Michael Doran of the Brookings Institution: …On the nuclear question specifically, I don\u2019t see this as stage one. In my view, there will never be a final agreement. What the administration just initiated was, rather, a long and expensive process by which the West pays Iran to refrain from going nuclear. […]<\/div>\n<\/li>\n

They’re not just for light rail and high-speed rail. And let me put this one in a separate paragraph so you don\u2019t miss it: building the Intercounty Connector caused the state to have to raise the gas tax. I repeat from the article: \u201cincreasing the gasoline tax.\u201d The Washington area is famous for extreme traffic […]<\/div>\n<\/li>\n

From The Witherspoon Institute: In Lincoln\u2019s mind, the view of America \u201cunder God\u201d hardly translated into a sweeping set of easily identifiable and zealously enforced public policies. His Second Inaugural makes it abundantly clear that \u201cthe Almighty has his own purposes\u201d that may or may not comport with the popular religious assumptions of even the […]<\/div>\n<\/li>\n

Yeah, it’s probably the get-away for some well-connected plutocrat who slips Putin useful information every now and then. \u00a0Still.<\/div>\n<\/li>\n

Have they traded places? In thinking about Manning-Brady XIV, I started rereading some of those old debates and got thinking about the arguments that justified picking one over the other. After all, Brady-Manning wasn’t really about the players; it was a referendum on how you valued numbers versus winning and how much the rest of […]<\/div>\n<\/li>\n

Indeed. \u00a0The whole post has 66 photos.<\/div>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n